Bardia vs Macquarie Fields, NSW Suburb Comparison

Bardia for families and schools; Macquarie Fields for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BardiaMacquarie Fields

Overall score

Bardia

41.8/100

Macquarie Fields

41.9/100

Crime rate

Bardia

55.7 / 1k

Macquarie Fields

96.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bardia

55

Macquarie Fields

283

Population

Bardia

5,747

Macquarie Fields

14,023

Metric leadBardia 2Macquarie Fields 101 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBardiaMacquarie Fields
Overall score41.8/10041.9/100
Housing (desirability)39.8/10048.8/100
Crime rate55.7 / 1k96.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools57
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves728
Public transport stops11170
Walkability16.5/10081.0/100
Nearby amenities55283
Planning activity2816
Green cover16.0%21.0%
Population5,74714,023
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bardia is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Macquarie Fields is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Bardia is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Macquarie Fields answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Choose Bardia if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Macquarie Fields for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons