Bardia vs Macquarie Fields, NSW suburb comparison

Bardia for retirees; Macquarie Fields for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BardiaMacquarie Fields

Overall score

Bardia

45.7/100

Macquarie Fields

61.3/100

Crime rate

Bardia

55.7 / 1k

Macquarie Fields

96.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bardia

50

Macquarie Fields

282

Population

Bardia

5,747

Macquarie Fields

14,023

Metric leadBardia 3Macquarie Fields 8across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBardiaMacquarie Fields
Overall score45.7/10061.3/100
Housing (desirability)54.9/10053.4/100
Crime rate55.7 / 1k96.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools57
Parks & reserves728
Public transport stops11170
Walkability16.5/10081.0/100
Nearby amenities50282
Planning activity2313
Population5,74714,023
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bardia is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Macquarie Fields is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Bardia is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Macquarie Fields answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves. On housing, Bardia sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Macquarie Fields.

Choose Bardia if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Macquarie Fields for families and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons