Macquarie Fields vs Macquarie Links, NSW suburb comparison

Macquarie Fields for families and investment; Macquarie Links for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Macquarie FieldsMacquarie Links

Overall score

Macquarie Fields

61.3/100

Macquarie Links

34.4/100

Crime rate

Macquarie Fields

96.8 / 1k

Macquarie Links

55.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Macquarie Fields

282

Macquarie Links

15

Population

Macquarie Fields

14,023

Macquarie Links

1,455

Metric leadMacquarie Fields 5Macquarie Links 5across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMacquarie FieldsMacquarie Links
Overall score61.3/10034.4/100
Housing (desirability)53.4/10054.9/100
Crime rate96.8 / 1k55.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools78
Parks & reserves28
Public transport stops17014
Walkability81.0/10021.0/100
Nearby amenities28215
Planning activity131
Population14,0231,455
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/1010/10

Comparison summary

Macquarie Fields reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Macquarie Links is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Macquarie Fields sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Macquarie Links is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Macquarie Fields is stronger for public transport access and walkability; Macquarie Links answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Macquarie Fields generally means more approachable housing costs, while Macquarie Links leans toward more sought-after housing.

Families and investors may find Macquarie Fields the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Macquarie Links.

Related comparisons