Barkers Creek vs McKenzie Hill, VIC Suburb Comparison

Barkers Creek for families and schools; McKenzie Hill for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Barkers CreekMcKenzie Hill

Overall score

Barkers Creek

59.3/100

McKenzie Hill

52.3/100

Crime rate

Barkers Creek

15.6 / 1k

McKenzie Hill

26.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Barkers Creek

6

McKenzie Hill

9

Population

Barkers Creek

487

McKenzie Hill

775

Metric leadBarkers Creek 5McKenzie Hill 33 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBarkers CreekMcKenzie Hill
Overall score59.3/10052.3/100
Housing (desirability)48.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate15.6 / 1k26.1 / 1k
Weather (desirability)53.4/10053.4/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops11
Walkability1.5/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities69
Green cover32.3%8.9%
Population487775
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Barkers Creek is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and McKenzie Hill is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

On the data, Barkers Creek is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; McKenzie Hill answers with housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.

Families may find Barkers Creek the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer McKenzie Hill.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons