Overall score
Barkers Creek
31.2/100
Harcourt
38.5/100
Barkers Creek for retirees and families; Harcourt for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Barkers Creek
31.2/100
Harcourt
38.5/100
Crime rate
Barkers Creek
7.8 / 1k
Harcourt
217.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Barkers Creek
2
Harcourt
30
Population
Barkers Creek
487
Harcourt
1,038
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Barkers Creek | Harcourt |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 31.2/100 | 38.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.0/100 | 68.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 7.8 / 1k | 217.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 6 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 11.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 30 |
| Population | 487 | 1,038 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 5/10 |
Barkers Creek reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Harcourt is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Barkers Creek tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Harcourt stands out for housing affordability and public transport access.
Retirees and families may find Barkers Creek the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Harcourt.