Overall score
Harcourt
38.5/100
McKenzie Hill
33.4/100
Harcourt for investment and schools; McKenzie Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Harcourt
38.5/100
McKenzie Hill
33.4/100
Crime rate
Harcourt
217.6 / 1k
McKenzie Hill
22.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Harcourt
30
McKenzie Hill
3
Population
Harcourt
1,038
McKenzie Hill
775
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Harcourt | McKenzie Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.5/100 | 33.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 68.9/100 | 89.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 217.6 / 1k | 22.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 1 |
| Walkability | 11.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 30 | 3 |
| Population | 1,038 | 775 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Harcourt reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; McKenzie Hill is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Harcourt is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; McKenzie Hill answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Harcourt suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas McKenzie Hill is the stronger match for retirees and families.