Harcourt vs McKenzie Hill, VIC Suburb Comparison

Harcourt for families; McKenzie Hill for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HarcourtMcKenzie Hill

Overall score

Harcourt

42.6/100

McKenzie Hill

52.3/100

Crime rate

Harcourt

225.8 / 1k

McKenzie Hill

26.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Harcourt

36

McKenzie Hill

9

Population

Harcourt

1,038

McKenzie Hill

775

Metric leadHarcourt 5McKenzie Hill 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHarcourtMcKenzie Hill
Overall score42.6/10052.3/100
Housing (desirability)53.2/10076.0/100
Crime rate225.8 / 1k26.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)53.4/10053.4/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops61
Walkability11.0/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities369
Green cover6.3%8.9%
Population1,038775
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Harcourt reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; McKenzie Hill is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

On the data, Harcourt is stronger for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability; McKenzie Hill answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Harcourt generally means more mid-market housing value, while McKenzie Hill leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Harcourt suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas McKenzie Hill is the stronger match for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons