Overall score
Harcourt
42.6/100
McKenzie Hill
52.3/100
Harcourt for families; McKenzie Hill for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Harcourt
42.6/100
McKenzie Hill
52.3/100
Crime rate
Harcourt
225.8 / 1k
McKenzie Hill
26.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Harcourt
36
McKenzie Hill
9
Population
Harcourt
1,038
McKenzie Hill
775
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Harcourt | McKenzie Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.6/100 | 52.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.2/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 225.8 / 1k | 26.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 53.4/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 1 |
| Walkability | 11.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 36 | 9 |
| Green cover | 6.3% | 8.9% |
| Population | 1,038 | 775 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Harcourt reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; McKenzie Hill is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Harcourt is stronger for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability; McKenzie Hill answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Harcourt generally means more mid-market housing value, while McKenzie Hill leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Harcourt suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas McKenzie Hill is the stronger match for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.