Barnsley vs Cameron Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Barnsley for families and investment; Cameron Park for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BarnsleyCameron Park

Overall score

Barnsley

42.1/100

Cameron Park

47.8/100

Crime rate

Barnsley

54.1 / 1k

Cameron Park

64.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Barnsley

35

Cameron Park

85

Population

Barnsley

1,735

Cameron Park

9,977

Metric leadBarnsley 3Cameron Park 81 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBarnsleyCameron Park
Overall score42.1/10047.8/100
Housing (desirability)58.5/10043.1/100
Crime rate54.1 / 1k64.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops45104
Walkability30.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities3585
Planning activity833
Green cover31.0%35.1%
Population1,7359,977
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/108/10

Comparison summary

Barnsley is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, while Cameron Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Barnsley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Cameron Park is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Barnsley is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Cameron Park answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Barnsley sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Cameron Park.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cameron Park, while Barnsley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons