Overall score
Barnsley
42.1/100
Cameron Park
47.8/100
Barnsley for families and investment; Cameron Park for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Barnsley
42.1/100
Cameron Park
47.8/100
Crime rate
Barnsley
54.1 / 1k
Cameron Park
64.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Barnsley
35
Cameron Park
85
Population
Barnsley
1,735
Cameron Park
9,977
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Barnsley | Cameron Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.1/100 | 47.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.5/100 | 43.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 54.1 / 1k | 64.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 45 | 104 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 35 | 85 |
| Planning activity | 8 | 33 |
| Green cover | 31.0% | 35.1% |
| Population | 1,735 | 9,977 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 8/10 |
Barnsley is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, while Cameron Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Barnsley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Cameron Park is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Barnsley is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Cameron Park answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Barnsley sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Cameron Park.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cameron Park, while Barnsley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.