Cameron Park vs Seahampton, NSW suburb comparison

Cameron Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cameron ParkSeahampton

Overall score

Cameron Park

59.2/100

Seahampton

22.9/100

Crime rate

Cameron Park

64.6 / 1k

Seahampton

49.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cameron Park

80

Seahampton

6

Population

Cameron Park

9,977

Seahampton

292

Metric leadCameron Park 6Seahampton 3across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCameron ParkSeahampton
Overall score59.2/10022.9/100
Housing (desirability)72.6/10076.5/100
Crime rate64.6 / 1k49.5 / 1k
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops1048
Walkability55.0/10012.0/100
Nearby amenities806
Planning activity311
Population9,977292
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/103/10

Comparison summary

Cameron Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Seahampton is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm. Cameron Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Seahampton is further out with more breathing room.

Cameron Park tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Seahampton stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Cameron Park generally means more sought-after housing, while Seahampton leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Cameron Park, while Seahampton remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons