Cameron Park vs Seahampton, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cameron Park for retirees and families; Seahampton for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cameron ParkSeahampton

Overall score

Cameron Park

47.8/100

Seahampton

36.7/100

Crime rate

Cameron Park

64.6 / 1k

Seahampton

49.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cameron Park

85

Seahampton

6

Population

Cameron Park

9,977

Seahampton

292

Metric leadCameron Park 7Seahampton 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCameron ParkSeahampton
Overall score47.8/10036.7/100
Housing (desirability)43.1/10056.5/100
Crime rate64.6 / 1k49.5 / 1k
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves2—
Public transport stops1048
Walkability55.0/10012.0/100
Nearby amenities856
Planning activity331
Green cover35.1%0.0%
Population9,977292
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/103/10

Comparison summary

Cameron Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Seahampton is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Cameron Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Seahampton is further out with more breathing room.

Cameron Park tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Seahampton stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cameron Park, while Seahampton remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons