Overall score
Cameron Park
59.2/100
Seahampton
22.9/100
Cameron Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cameron Park
59.2/100
Seahampton
22.9/100
Crime rate
Cameron Park
64.6 / 1k
Seahampton
49.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cameron Park
80
Seahampton
6
Population
Cameron Park
9,977
Seahampton
292
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cameron Park | Seahampton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.2/100 | 22.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 72.6/100 | 76.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.6 / 1k | 49.5 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Public transport stops | 104 | 8 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 12.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 80 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 1 |
| Population | 9,977 | 292 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 3/10 |
Cameron Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Seahampton is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm. Cameron Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Seahampton is further out with more breathing room.
Cameron Park tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Seahampton stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Cameron Park generally means more sought-after housing, while Seahampton leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Cameron Park, while Seahampton remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.