Overall score
Cameron Park
59.2/100
Fletcher
51.9/100
Cameron Park vs Fletcher, NSW suburb comparison
Cameron Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Cameron ParkFletcher
Crime rate
Cameron Park
64.6 / 1k
Fletcher
59.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cameron Park
80
Fletcher
81
Population
Cameron Park
9,977
Fletcher
8,014
Metric leadCameron Park 4Fletcher 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesCameron Park
- Best for familiesCameron Park
- Best for best valueCameron Park
- Best for best schoolsCameron Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cameron Park | Fletcher |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.2/100 | 51.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 72.6/100 | 66.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.6 / 1k | 59.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 104 | 58 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 80 | 81 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 15 |
| Population | 9,977 | 8,014 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Cameron Park is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Fletcher is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Cameron Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and public transport access, whereas Fletcher is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Cameron Park, while Fletcher remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.