Overall score
Fletcher
51.9/100
Shortland
50.5/100
Fletcher vs Shortland, NSW suburb comparison
Fletcher for retirees and schools; Shortland for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
FletcherShortland
Crime rate
Fletcher
59.7 / 1k
Shortland
68.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fletcher
81
Shortland
161
Population
Fletcher
8,014
Shortland
4,537
Metric leadFletcher 4Shortland 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fletcher | Shortland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.9/100 | 50.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.7/100 | 75.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.7 / 1k | 68.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 58 | 84 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 81 | 161 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 12 |
| Population | 8,014 | 4,537 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Fletcher reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Shortland is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Fletcher is stronger for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability; Shortland answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Fletcher generally means more sought-after housing, while Shortland leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Fletcher if you are weighing retirees and households prioritising schools; lean toward Shortland for investors and value-focused buyers.