Overall score
Jesmond
47.5/100
Shortland
50.5/100
Jesmond for families and schools; Shortland for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Jesmond
47.5/100
Shortland
50.5/100
Crime rate
Jesmond
108.6 / 1k
Shortland
68.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Jesmond
299
Shortland
161
Population
Jesmond
3,210
Shortland
4,537
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Jesmond | Shortland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.5/100 | 50.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.5/100 | 75.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 108.6 / 1k | 68.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 31 | 84 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 299 | 161 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 12 |
| Population | 3,210 | 4,537 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 3/10 |
Jesmond is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Shortland is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Jesmond pulls ahead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Shortland is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Jesmond suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Shortland is the stronger match for retirees and investors.