Jesmond vs Shortland, NSW Suburb Comparison

Jesmond for retirees and families; Shortland for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

JesmondShortland

Overall score

Jesmond

42.9/100

Shortland

37.9/100

Crime rate

Jesmond

108.6 / 1k

Shortland

68.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Jesmond

304

Shortland

164

Population

Jesmond

3,210

Shortland

4,537

Metric leadJesmond 6Shortland 61 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJesmondShortland
Overall score42.9/10037.9/100
Housing (desirability)43.5/10077.7/100
Crime rate108.6 / 1k68.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools74
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves14
Public transport stops3184
Walkability100.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities304164
Planning activity1415
Green cover16.1%2.9%
Population3,2104,537
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Jesmond is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Shortland is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Jesmond pulls ahead on schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Shortland is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

Jesmond suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Shortland is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons