Jesmond vs Rankin Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Rankin Park for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

JesmondRankin Park

Overall score

Jesmond

42.9/100

Rankin Park

51.4/100

Crime rate

Jesmond

108.6 / 1k

Rankin Park

59.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Jesmond

304

Rankin Park

25

Population

Jesmond

3,210

Rankin Park

2,547

Metric leadJesmond 5Rankin Park 71 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJesmondRankin Park
Overall score42.9/10051.4/100
Housing (desirability)43.5/10063.0/100
Crime rate108.6 / 1k59.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools74
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops3140
Walkability100.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities30425
Planning activity1416
Green cover16.1%28.9%
Population3,2102,547
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/109/10

Comparison summary

Jesmond is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Rankin Park is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Jesmond sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Rankin Park is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Jesmond is stronger for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Rankin Park answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Rankin Park, while Jesmond remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons