Lambton vs Rankin Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Lambton for retirees and families; Rankin Park for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LambtonRankin Park

Overall score

Lambton

54.7/100

Rankin Park

51.4/100

Crime rate

Lambton

108.6 / 1k

Rankin Park

59.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lambton

148

Rankin Park

25

Population

Lambton

5,214

Rankin Park

2,547

Metric leadLambton 8Rankin Park 41 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLambtonRankin Park
Overall score54.7/10051.4/100
Housing (desirability)74.4/10063.0/100
Crime rate108.6 / 1k59.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools154
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops8040
Walkability67.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities14825
Planning activity2916
Green cover24.9%28.9%
Population5,2142,547
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/109/10

Comparison summary

Lambton reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Rankin Park is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Lambton sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Rankin Park is further out with more breathing room.

Lambton tends to lead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Rankin Park stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Rankin Park, while Lambton remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons