Minmi vs Shortland, NSW suburb comparison

Minmi for retirees; Shortland for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MinmiShortland

Overall score

Minmi

39.3/100

Shortland

50.5/100

Crime rate

Minmi

59.3 / 1k

Shortland

68.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Minmi

48

Shortland

161

Population

Minmi

700

Shortland

4,537

Metric leadMinmi 2Shortland 9across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMinmiShortland
Overall score39.3/10050.5/100
Housing (desirability)66.7/10075.3/100
Crime rate59.3 / 1k68.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops2484
Walkability32.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities48161
Planning activity1612
Population7004,537
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/103/10

Comparison summary

Minmi is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Shortland is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Minmi is stronger for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Shortland answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Minmi generally means more sought-after housing, while Shortland leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Minmi if you are weighing retirees and households prioritising schools; lean toward Shortland for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons