Shortland vs Warabrook, NSW Suburb Comparison

Warabrook for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ShortlandWarabrook

Overall score

Shortland

37.9/100

Warabrook

46.9/100

Crime rate

Shortland

68.3 / 1k

Warabrook

109.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Shortland

164

Warabrook

47

Population

Shortland

4,537

Warabrook

1,982

Metric leadShortland 5Warabrook 61 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryShortlandWarabrook
Overall score37.9/10046.9/100
Housing (desirability)77.7/10063.2/100
Crime rate68.3 / 1k109.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools46
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves4—
Public transport stops8435
Walkability55.0/10072.0/100
Nearby amenities16447
Planning activity153
Green cover2.9%3.8%
Population4,5371,982
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Shortland is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Warabrook is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Shortland tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, while Warabrook stands out for schools and education options, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook.

Shortland suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Warabrook is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons