Overall score
Shortland
50.5/100
Warabrook
45.7/100
Shortland vs Warabrook, NSW suburb comparison
Shortland for investment and value; Warabrook for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ShortlandWarabrook
Crime rate
Shortland
68.3 / 1k
Warabrook
109.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Shortland
161
Warabrook
45
Population
Shortland
4,537
Warabrook
1,982
Metric leadShortland 6Warabrook 4across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Shortland | Warabrook |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.5/100 | 45.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 75.3/100 | 55.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 68.3 / 1k | 109.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | — |
| Public transport stops | 84 | 35 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 72.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 161 | 45 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 2 |
| Population | 4,537 | 1,982 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Shortland is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Warabrook is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Shortland tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Warabrook stands out for walkability and a calmer planning outlook. Shortland generally means more approachable housing costs, while Warabrook leans toward more sought-after housing.
Shortland suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Warabrook is the stronger match for retirees.