Overall score
Maryland
50.3/100
Shortland
50.5/100
Maryland vs Shortland, NSW suburb comparison
Maryland for retirees and families; Shortland for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MarylandShortland
Crime rate
Maryland
59.7 / 1k
Shortland
68.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Maryland
93
Shortland
161
Population
Maryland
7,714
Shortland
4,537
Metric leadMaryland 5Shortland 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Maryland | Shortland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.3/100 | 50.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.7/100 | 75.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.7 / 1k | 68.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 115 | 84 |
| Walkability | 49.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 93 | 161 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 12 |
| Population | 7,714 | 4,537 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Maryland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Shortland is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Maryland tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Shortland stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. Maryland generally means more sought-after housing, while Shortland leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Maryland suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Shortland is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.