Barrack Heights vs Shell Cove, NSW Suburb Comparison

Barrack Heights for investment; Shell Cove for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Barrack HeightsShell Cove

Overall score

Barrack Heights

37.7/100

Shell Cove

55.4/100

Crime rate

Barrack Heights

80.0 / 1k

Shell Cove

73.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Barrack Heights

80

Shell Cove

178

Population

Barrack Heights

6,003

Shell Cove

7,591

Metric leadBarrack Heights 4Shell Cove 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBarrack HeightsShell Cove
Overall score37.7/10055.4/100
Housing (desirability)68.2/10049.5/100
Crime rate80.0 / 1k73.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools83
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1020
Public transport stops9256
Walkability36.0/10084.0/100
Nearby amenities80178
Planning activity1943
Green cover7.1%20.4%
Population6,0037,591
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Barrack Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Shell Cove is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Shell Cove is shaped by the coast, Barrack Heights offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Barrack Heights tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access, while Shell Cove stands out for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Shell Cove, while Barrack Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons