Overall score
Barwon Heads
63.7/100
Leopold
53.2/100
Barwon Heads for families and beach lifestyle; Leopold for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Barwon Heads
63.7/100
Leopold
53.2/100
Crime rate
Barwon Heads
33.1 / 1k
Leopold
40.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Barwon Heads
88
Leopold
159
Population
Barwon Heads
4,353
Leopold
13,272
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Barwon Heads | Leopold |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.7/100 | 53.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.8/100 | 58.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.1 / 1k | 40.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 17 |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 70 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 84.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 88 | 159 |
| Planning activity | 109 | 48 |
| Green cover | 7.1% | 1.8% |
| Population | 4,353 | 13,272 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Barwon Heads reads as a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone; Leopold is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Barwon Heads sits among greener hillside streets, while Leopold keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Barwon Heads tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Leopold stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. Barwon Heads generally means more sought-after housing, while Leopold leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Barwon Heads the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Leopold.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.