Leopold vs Wallington, VIC Suburb Comparison

Leopold for retirees and beach lifestyle; Wallington for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LeopoldWallington

Overall score

Leopold

53.2/100

Wallington

47.3/100

Crime rate

Leopold

40.7 / 1k

Wallington

51.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Leopold

159

Wallington

9

Population

Leopold

13,272

Wallington

1,515

Metric leadLeopold 9Wallington 22 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLeopoldWallington
Overall score53.2/10047.3/100
Housing (desirability)58.4/10036.6/100
Crime rate40.7 / 1k51.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves173
Public transport stops7012
Walkability84.0/10020.0/100
Nearby amenities1599
Planning activity4827
Green cover1.8%1.7%
Population13,2721,515
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/109/10

Comparison summary

Leopold is a coastal established suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm, while Wallington is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Leopold leans into coastal living, while Wallington feels more inland and suburban in character.

Leopold tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, while Wallington stands out for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Leopold generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Wallington leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Leopold if you are weighing people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Wallington for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons