Overall score
Beauty Point
44.0/100
Clarence Point
29.7/100
Beauty Point vs Clarence Point, TAS Suburb Comparison
Beauty Point for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Beauty PointClarence Point
Crime rate
Beauty Point
18.3 / 1k
Clarence Point
55.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beauty Point
6
Clarence Point
1
Population
Beauty Point
1,285
Clarence Point
266
Metric leadBeauty Point 7Clarence Point 11 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBeauty Point
- Best for familiesBeauty Point
- Best for investmentBeauty Point
- Best for best valueBeauty Point
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beauty Point | Clarence Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.0/100 | 29.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.5/100 | 47.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.3 / 1k | 55.5 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 5 | — |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 6 | 1 |
| Green cover | 22.7% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,285 | 266 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Beauty Point is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Clarence Point is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
On the data, Beauty Point is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability; Clarence Point answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Beauty Point, while Clarence Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.