Overall score
Beauty Point
44.0/100
Deviot
46.1/100
Beauty Point vs Deviot, TAS Suburb Comparison
Beauty Point for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Beauty PointDeviot
Crime rate
Beauty Point
18.3 / 1k
Deviot
18.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beauty Point
6
Deviot
0
Population
Beauty Point
1,285
Deviot
359
Metric leadBeauty Point 4Deviot 24 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBeauty Point
- Best for familiesBeauty Point
- Best for investmentBeauty Point
- Best for best valueBeauty Point
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beauty Point | Deviot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.0/100 | 46.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.5/100 | 54.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.3 / 1k | 18.3 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 5 |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 7.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 6 | 0 |
| Green cover | 22.7% | 3.5% |
| Population | 1,285 | 359 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Beauty Point is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Deviot is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Beauty Point is stronger for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Deviot answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage. Beauty Point generally means more approachable housing costs, while Deviot leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Choose Beauty Point if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Deviot for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.