Beechboro vs Caversham, WA suburb comparison

Beechboro for families and schools; Caversham for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeechboroCaversham

Overall score

Beechboro

63.0/100

Caversham

61.2/100

Crime rate

Beechboro

1015.7 / 1k

Caversham

1215.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beechboro

72

Caversham

87

Population

Beechboro

9,112

Caversham

7,419

Metric leadBeechboro 5Caversham 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeechboroCaversham
Overall score63.0/10061.2/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate1015.7 / 1k1215.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools51
Parks & reserves1215
Public transport stops4831
Walkability59.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities7287
Population9,1127,419
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/108/10

Comparison summary

Beechboro reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Caversham is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Beechboro is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Caversham answers with parks and reserves and walkability. Beechboro generally means more approachable housing costs, while Caversham leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees are more likely to prefer Caversham, while Beechboro remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons