Bennett Springs vs Caversham, WA Suburb Comparison

Caversham for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bennett SpringsCaversham

Overall score

Bennett Springs

37.9/100

Caversham

49.4/100

Crime rate

Bennett Springs

43.1 / 1k

Caversham

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bennett Springs

45

Caversham

191

Population

Bennett Springs

5,929

Caversham

7,419

Metric leadBennett Springs 2Caversham 82 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBennett SpringsCaversham
Overall score37.9/10049.4/100
Housing (desirability)40.4/10048.9/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves1015
Public transport stops2131
Walkability30.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities45191
Green cover7.6%6.7%
Population5,9297,419
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/108/10

Comparison summary

Bennett Springs is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Caversham is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Bennett Springs pulls ahead on schools and education options, whereas Caversham is the better pick for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Caversham, while Bennett Springs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons