Beerwah vs Glass House Mountains, QLD suburb comparison

Beerwah for investment and value; Glass House Mountains for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeerwahGlass House Mountains

Overall score

Beerwah

63.6/100

Glass House Mountains

52.1/100

Crime rate

Beerwah

49.9 / 1k

Glass House Mountains

17.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beerwah

89

Glass House Mountains

23

Population

Beerwah

7,734

Glass House Mountains

5,601

Metric leadBeerwah 7Glass House Mountains 3across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeerwahGlass House Mountains
Overall score63.6/10052.1/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10083.2/100
Crime rate49.9 / 1k17.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Parks & reserves1322
Public transport stops54
Walkability55.5/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities8923
Population7,7345,601
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Beerwah is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Glass House Mountains is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.

Beerwah tends to lead on housing affordability and schools and education options, while Glass House Mountains stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Beerwah generally means more approachable housing costs, while Glass House Mountains leans toward more sought-after housing.

Beerwah suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Glass House Mountains is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons