Overall score
Beerwah
49.4/100
Glass House Mountains
46.5/100
Beerwah for retirees and investment; Glass House Mountains for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beerwah
49.4/100
Glass House Mountains
46.5/100
Crime rate
Beerwah
76.4 / 1k
Glass House Mountains
29.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beerwah
108
Glass House Mountains
34
Population
Beerwah
7,734
Glass House Mountains
5,601
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beerwah | Glass House Mountains |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.4/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 53.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 76.4 / 1k | 29.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 4 |
| Walkability | 55.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 108 | 34 |
| Green cover | 8.7% | 2.8% |
| Population | 7,734 | 5,601 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Beerwah is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Glass House Mountains is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.
Beerwah tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access, while Glass House Mountains stands out for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Beerwah suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Glass House Mountains is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.