Overall score
Beerwah
63.6/100
Glass House Mountains
52.1/100
Beerwah for investment and value; Glass House Mountains for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beerwah
63.6/100
Glass House Mountains
52.1/100
Crime rate
Beerwah
49.9 / 1k
Glass House Mountains
17.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beerwah
89
Glass House Mountains
23
Population
Beerwah
7,734
Glass House Mountains
5,601
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beerwah | Glass House Mountains |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.6/100 | 52.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 83.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 49.9 / 1k | 17.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 4 |
| Walkability | 55.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 23 |
| Population | 7,734 | 5,601 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Beerwah is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Glass House Mountains is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.
Beerwah tends to lead on housing affordability and schools and education options, while Glass House Mountains stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Beerwah generally means more approachable housing costs, while Glass House Mountains leans toward more sought-after housing.
Beerwah suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Glass House Mountains is the stronger match for retirees and families.