Beerwah vs Glass House Mountains, QLD Suburb Comparison

Beerwah for retirees and investment; Glass House Mountains for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeerwahGlass House Mountains

Overall score

Beerwah

49.4/100

Glass House Mountains

46.5/100

Crime rate

Beerwah

76.4 / 1k

Glass House Mountains

29.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beerwah

108

Glass House Mountains

34

Population

Beerwah

7,734

Glass House Mountains

5,601

Metric leadBeerwah 8Glass House Mountains 31 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeerwahGlass House Mountains
Overall score49.4/10046.5/100
Housing (desirability)60.5/10053.9/100
Crime rate76.4 / 1k29.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves1322
Public transport stops54
Walkability55.5/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities10834
Green cover8.7%2.8%
Population7,7345,601
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Beerwah is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Glass House Mountains is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.

Beerwah tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access, while Glass House Mountains stands out for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Beerwah suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Glass House Mountains is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons