Glass House Mountains vs Mount Mellum, QLD Suburb Comparison

Glass House Mountains for retirees and families; Mount Mellum for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Glass House MountainsMount Mellum

Overall score

Glass House Mountains

46.5/100

Mount Mellum

43.2/100

Crime rate

Glass House Mountains

29.4 / 1k

Mount Mellum

40.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glass House Mountains

34

Mount Mellum

3

Population

Glass House Mountains

5,601

Mount Mellum

457

Metric leadGlass House Mountains 7Mount Mellum 11 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlass House MountainsMount Mellum
Overall score46.5/10043.2/100
Housing (desirability)53.9/10041.1/100
Crime rate29.4 / 1k40.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves22—
Public transport stops4—
Walkability6.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities343
Green cover2.8%0.1%
Population5,601457
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Glass House Mountains is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Mount Mellum is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood.

Glass House Mountains pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability, whereas Mount Mellum is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage. Glass House Mountains generally means more sought-after housing, while Mount Mellum leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Glass House Mountains the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Mount Mellum.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons