Overall score
Bees Creek
30.8/100
McMinns Lagoon
23.1/100
Bees Creek for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bees Creek
30.8/100
McMinns Lagoon
23.1/100
Nearby amenities
Bees Creek
6
McMinns Lagoon
1
Population
Bees Creek
803
McMinns Lagoon
687
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bees Creek | McMinns Lagoon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.8/100 | 23.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 16.8/100 | 10.7/100 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 4 |
| Walkability | 18.0/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 6 | 1 |
| Population | 803 | 687 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Bees Creek reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; McMinns Lagoon is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city.
Bees Creek holds the clearer edge on housing affordability and public transport access, while McMinns Lagoon is closer across the remaining categories.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Bees Creek, while McMinns Lagoon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.