Overall score
Bees Creek
33.8/100
McMinns Lagoon
38.2/100
Bees Creek vs McMinns Lagoon, NT Suburb Comparison
McMinns Lagoon for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Bees CreekMcMinns Lagoon
Nearby amenities
Bees Creek
6
McMinns Lagoon
1
Population
Bees Creek
803
McMinns Lagoon
687
Metric leadBees Creek 5McMinns Lagoon 22 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMcMinns Lagoon
- Best for investmentMcMinns Lagoon
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bees Creek | McMinns Lagoon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.8/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.1/100 | 24.8/100 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 4 |
| Walkability | 18.0/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 6 | 1 |
| Green cover | 3.5% | 33.9% |
| Population | 803 | 687 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Bees Creek reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; McMinns Lagoon is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
On the data, Bees Creek is stronger for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability; McMinns Lagoon answers with an emerging neighbourhood.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Bees Creek, while McMinns Lagoon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.