Overall score
Coolalinga
40.4/100
McMinns Lagoon
23.1/100
Coolalinga vs McMinns Lagoon, NT suburb comparison
Coolalinga for investment and value; McMinns Lagoon for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CoolalingaMcMinns Lagoon
Nearby amenities
Coolalinga
72
McMinns Lagoon
1
Population
Coolalinga
510
McMinns Lagoon
687
Metric leadCoolalinga 4McMinns Lagoon 3across 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMcMinns Lagoon
- Best for investmentCoolalinga
- Best for best valueCoolalinga
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coolalinga | McMinns Lagoon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.4/100 | 23.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 25.5/100 | 10.7/100 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 4 |
| Walkability | 64.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 72 | 1 |
| Population | 510 | 687 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Coolalinga is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and McMinns Lagoon is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city.
Coolalinga pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas McMinns Lagoon is the better pick for public transport access and a larger local community. Coolalinga generally means more approachable housing costs, while McMinns Lagoon leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Choose Coolalinga if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward McMinns Lagoon for retirees.