Belgrave South vs Narre Warren East, VIC Suburb Comparison

Belgrave South for retirees and families; Narre Warren East for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Belgrave SouthNarre Warren East

Overall score

Belgrave South

61.1/100

Narre Warren East

45.0/100

Crime rate

Belgrave South

50.1 / 1k

Narre Warren East

102.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belgrave South

43

Narre Warren East

10

Population

Belgrave South

1,670

Narre Warren East

434

Metric leadBelgrave South 8Narre Warren East 21 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelgrave SouthNarre Warren East
Overall score61.1/10045.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.1/10044.7/100
Crime rate50.1 / 1k102.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves2—
Public transport stops166
Walkability70.0/1009.0/100
Nearby amenities4310
Planning activity5016
Green cover38.0%21.9%
Population1,670434
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Belgrave South is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Narre Warren East is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Belgrave South sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Narre Warren East is further out with more breathing room.

Belgrave South tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, while Narre Warren East stands out for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Belgrave South suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Narre Warren East is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons