Belgrave Heights vs Narre Warren East, VIC Suburb Comparison

Belgrave Heights for retirees and families; Narre Warren East for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Belgrave HeightsNarre Warren East

Overall score

Belgrave Heights

55.6/100

Narre Warren East

45.0/100

Crime rate

Belgrave Heights

26.2 / 1k

Narre Warren East

102.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belgrave Heights

87

Narre Warren East

10

Population

Belgrave Heights

1,398

Narre Warren East

434

Metric leadBelgrave Heights 6Narre Warren East 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelgrave HeightsNarre Warren East
Overall score55.6/10045.0/100
Housing (desirability)51.4/10044.7/100
Crime rate26.2 / 1k102.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops56
Walkability9.5/1009.0/100
Nearby amenities8710
Planning activity3116
Green cover10.1%21.9%
Population1,398434
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Belgrave Heights is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Narre Warren East is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Belgrave Heights sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Narre Warren East is further out with more breathing room.

Belgrave Heights pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Narre Warren East is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook.

Choose Belgrave Heights if you are weighing families, investors, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Narre Warren East for retirees and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons