Belgrave Heights vs Lysterfield, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Belgrave Heights | Lysterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.4/100 | 52.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.3/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 19.3 / 1k | 25.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 10 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 25 |
| Walkability | 9.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 86 | 23 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 86 |
| Population | 1,398 | 6,681 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesLysterfield
- Best for investmentBelgrave Heights
- Best for best valueBelgrave Heights
- Best for best schoolsBelgrave Heights
Comparison summary
Belgrave Heights reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Lysterfield is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Belgrave Heights sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Lysterfield is further out with more breathing room.
Belgrave Heights pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Lysterfield is the better pick for public transport access and walkability.
Choose Belgrave Heights if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Lysterfield for retirees.