Overall score
Belgrave Heights
47.8/100
Lysterfield
52.6/100
Belgrave Heights for families and investment; Lysterfield for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belgrave Heights
47.8/100
Lysterfield
52.6/100
Crime rate
Belgrave Heights
25.2 / 1k
Lysterfield
19.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belgrave Heights
86
Lysterfield
23
Population
Belgrave Heights
1,398
Lysterfield
6,681
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belgrave Heights | Lysterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.8/100 | 52.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.3/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 25.2 / 1k | 19.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 10 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 25 |
| Walkability | 9.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 86 | 23 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 86 |
| Population | 1,398 | 6,681 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Belgrave Heights reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Lysterfield is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Belgrave Heights sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Lysterfield is further out with more breathing room.
Belgrave Heights pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas Lysterfield is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Choose Belgrave Heights if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Lysterfield for retirees.