Lysterfield vs Tecoma, VIC Suburb Comparison

Lysterfield for families; Tecoma for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LysterfieldTecoma

Overall score

Lysterfield

56.3/100

Tecoma

59.2/100

Crime rate

Lysterfield

21.4 / 1k

Tecoma

28.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lysterfield

48

Tecoma

66

Population

Lysterfield

6,681

Tecoma

2,064

Metric leadLysterfield 5Tecoma 61 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLysterfieldTecoma
Overall score56.3/10059.2/100
Housing (desirability)43.0/10068.3/100
Crime rate21.4 / 1k28.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools17
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves10—
Public transport stops2523
Walkability30.0/10040.0/100
Nearby amenities4866
Planning activity8623
Green cover36.8%5.5%
Population6,6812,064
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Lysterfield is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Tecoma is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.

Lysterfield tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and overall desirability, while Tecoma stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability.

Retirees may find Lysterfield the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Tecoma.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons