Lysterfield vs Tecoma, VIC suburb comparison

Lysterfield for retirees; Tecoma for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LysterfieldTecoma

Overall score

Lysterfield

52.6/100

Tecoma

48.9/100

Crime rate

Lysterfield

19.5 / 1k

Tecoma

27.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lysterfield

23

Tecoma

54

Population

Lysterfield

6,681

Tecoma

2,064

Metric leadLysterfield 5Tecoma 5across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLysterfieldTecoma
Overall score52.6/10048.9/100
Housing (desirability)45.9/10057.8/100
Crime rate19.5 / 1k27.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools17
Parks & reserves10
Public transport stops2523
Walkability30.0/10040.0/100
Nearby amenities2354
Planning activity8623
Population6,6812,064
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Lysterfield is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Tecoma is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Lysterfield sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Tecoma is in a middle-ring position.

Lysterfield tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Tecoma stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.

Retirees may find Lysterfield the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Tecoma.

Related comparisons