Belhus vs Upper Swan, WA Suburb Comparison

Belhus for families and schools; Upper Swan for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelhusUpper Swan

Overall score

Belhus

44.7/100

Upper Swan

48.7/100

Crime rate

Belhus

43.1 / 1k

Upper Swan

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belhus

45

Upper Swan

17

Population

Belhus

264

Upper Swan

549

Metric leadBelhus 3Upper Swan 62 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelhusUpper Swan
Overall score44.7/10048.7/100
Housing (desirability)31.0/10053.7/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Public transport stops822
Walkability12.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities4517
Green cover4.1%13.9%
Population264549
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/105/10

Comparison summary

Belhus reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Upper Swan is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Belhus sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Upper Swan is further out with more breathing room.

Belhus tends to lead on schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Upper Swan stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Choose Belhus if you are weighing retirees, families, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Upper Swan for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons