Baskerville vs Upper Swan, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Baskerville | Upper Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.6/100 | 40.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.7/100 | 43.7/100 |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | 22 |
| Walkability | 17.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 8 | 4 |
| Population | 302 | 549 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 5/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBaskerville
- Best for familiesBaskerville
- Best for investmentUpper Swan
- Best for best valueUpper Swan
- Best for best schoolsUpper Swan
Comparison summary
Baskerville and Upper Swan offer different strengths across official suburb data. Upper Swan leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Upper Swan; Housing (desirability) favours Upper Swan; Public transport stops favours Upper Swan. Quick verdicts: Retirees → Baskerville, Families → Baskerville, Investment → Upper Swan, Best value → Upper Swan.