Bullsbrook vs Upper Swan, WA Suburb Comparison

Bullsbrook for retirees and value; Upper Swan for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BullsbrookUpper Swan

Overall score

Bullsbrook

41.5/100

Upper Swan

48.7/100

Crime rate

Bullsbrook

43.1 / 1k

Upper Swan

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bullsbrook

92

Upper Swan

17

Population

Bullsbrook

5,605

Upper Swan

549

Metric leadBullsbrook 4Upper Swan 43 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBullsbrookUpper Swan
Overall score41.5/10048.7/100
Housing (desirability)41.5/10053.7/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves7—
Public transport stops2522
Walkability59.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities9217
Planning activity2—
Green cover4.2%13.9%
Population5,605549
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bullsbrook is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Upper Swan is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Bullsbrook sits among greener hillside streets, while Upper Swan keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bullsbrook pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Upper Swan is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Bullsbrook suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Upper Swan is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons