Overall score
Bullsbrook
41.5/100
Upper Swan
48.7/100
Bullsbrook for retirees and value; Upper Swan for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bullsbrook
41.5/100
Upper Swan
48.7/100
Crime rate
Bullsbrook
43.1 / 1k
Upper Swan
43.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bullsbrook
92
Upper Swan
17
Population
Bullsbrook
5,605
Upper Swan
549
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bullsbrook | Upper Swan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.5/100 | 48.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.5/100 | 53.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.1 / 1k | 43.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | — |
| Public transport stops | 25 | 22 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 92 | 17 |
| Planning activity | 2 | — |
| Green cover | 4.2% | 13.9% |
| Population | 5,605 | 549 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Bullsbrook is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Upper Swan is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Bullsbrook sits among greener hillside streets, while Upper Swan keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bullsbrook pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Upper Swan is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Bullsbrook suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Upper Swan is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.