Overall score
Bell Park
48.0/100
Lovely Banks
35.5/100
Bell Park for retirees and families; Lovely Banks for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bell Park
48.0/100
Lovely Banks
35.5/100
Crime rate
Bell Park
83.3 / 1k
Lovely Banks
71.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bell Park
147
Lovely Banks
2
Population
Bell Park
5,602
Lovely Banks
2,782
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bell Park | Lovely Banks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.0/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 70.1/100 | 53.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 83.3 / 1k | 71.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 26 | 5 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 7.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 147 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 48 | 14 |
| Green cover | 6.8% | 0.3% |
| Population | 5,602 | 2,782 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Bell Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Lovely Banks is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Lovely Banks sits among greener hillside streets, while Bell Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bell Park tends to lead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, while Lovely Banks stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook. Bell Park generally means more approachable housing costs, while Lovely Banks leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Choose Bell Park if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Lovely Banks for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.