Bell Park vs Lovely Banks, VIC Suburb Comparison

Bell Park for retirees and families; Lovely Banks for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bell ParkLovely Banks

Overall score

Bell Park

48.0/100

Lovely Banks

35.5/100

Crime rate

Bell Park

83.3 / 1k

Lovely Banks

71.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bell Park

147

Lovely Banks

2

Population

Bell Park

5,602

Lovely Banks

2,782

Metric leadBell Park 8Lovely Banks 32 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBell ParkLovely Banks
Overall score48.0/10035.5/100
Housing (desirability)70.1/10053.6/100
Crime rate83.3 / 1k71.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools81
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves22
Public transport stops265
Walkability100.0/1007.5/100
Nearby amenities1472
Planning activity4814
Green cover6.8%0.3%
Population5,6022,782
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bell Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Lovely Banks is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Lovely Banks sits among greener hillside streets, while Bell Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bell Park tends to lead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, while Lovely Banks stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook. Bell Park generally means more approachable housing costs, while Lovely Banks leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Choose Bell Park if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Lovely Banks for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons