Bellamack vs Zuccoli, NT Suburb Comparison

Bellamack for investment; Zuccoli for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BellamackZuccoli

Overall score

Bellamack

39.8/100

Zuccoli

50.9/100

Nearby amenities

Bellamack

28

Zuccoli

51

Population

Bellamack

2,423

Zuccoli

4,131

Metric leadBellamack 0Zuccoli 92 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBellamackZuccoli
Overall score39.8/10050.9/100
Housing (desirability)22.8/10045.9/100
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves16
Public transport stops58
Walkability13.5/10056.0/100
Nearby amenities2851
Green cover16.3%26.7%
Population2,4234,131
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Bellamack is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Zuccoli is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Bellamack tends to lead on family-friendly schooling options and improving crime trends, while Zuccoli stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Bellamack sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Zuccoli.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Zuccoli, while Bellamack remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons