Overall score
Bellamack
39.8/100
Gunn
43.0/100
Bellamack vs Gunn, NT Suburb Comparison
Gunn for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BellamackGunn
Nearby amenities
Bellamack
28
Gunn
31
Population
Bellamack
2,423
Gunn
2,564
Metric leadBellamack 2Gunn 63 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bellamack | Gunn |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.8/100 | 43.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 22.8/100 | 30.4/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 3 |
| Walkability | 13.5/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 28 | 31 |
| Green cover | 16.3% | 22.8% |
| Population | 2,423 | 2,564 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Bellamack is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Gunn is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Bellamack pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Gunn is the better pick for parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.
On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gunn, while Bellamack remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.