Overall score
Gunn
43.0/100
Woodroffe
36.9/100
Gunn vs Woodroffe, NT Suburb Comparison
Gunn for retirees; Woodroffe for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GunnWoodroffe
Nearby amenities
Gunn
31
Woodroffe
51
Population
Gunn
2,564
Woodroffe
3,175
Metric leadGunn 3Woodroffe 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gunn | Woodroffe |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.0/100 | 36.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.4/100 | 46.4/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 8 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 14.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 31 | 51 |
| Green cover | 22.8% | 6.4% |
| Population | 2,564 | 3,175 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Gunn reads as a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Woodroffe is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Gunn tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Woodroffe stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. Gunn generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Woodroffe leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees may find Gunn the better fit, while families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Woodroffe.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.