Gunn vs Woodroffe, NT suburb comparison

Gunn for retirees; Woodroffe for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GunnWoodroffe

Overall score

Gunn

35.4/100

Woodroffe

47.2/100

Nearby amenities

Gunn

31

Woodroffe

48

Population

Gunn

2,564

Woodroffe

3,175

Metric leadGunn 1Woodroffe 8across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGunnWoodroffe
Overall score35.4/10047.2/100
Housing (desirability)22.4/10050.1/100
Schools & preschools49
Parks & reserves68
Public transport stops38
Walkability4.5/10014.0/100
Nearby amenities3148
Population2,5643,175
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/103/10

Comparison summary

Gunn reads as a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm; Woodroffe is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Gunn tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Woodroffe stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Gunn generally means more mid-market housing value, while Woodroffe leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees may find Gunn the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Woodroffe.

Related comparisons