Overall score
Gunn
43.0/100
Moulden
30.0/100
Gunn vs Moulden, NT Suburb Comparison
Gunn for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GunnMoulden
Nearby amenities
Gunn
31
Moulden
29
Population
Gunn
2,564
Moulden
3,053
Metric leadGunn 5Moulden 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gunn | Moulden |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.4/100 | 21.2/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 9 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 31 | 29 |
| Green cover | 22.8% | 6.0% |
| Population | 2,564 | 3,053 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Gunn reads as a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Moulden is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm.
On the data, Gunn is stronger for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Moulden answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Gunn sits in a gently premium band, compared with a affordable feel in Moulden.
Choose Gunn if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Moulden for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.