Overall score
Gunn
43.0/100
Zuccoli
50.9/100
Gunn for families and investment; Zuccoli for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gunn
43.0/100
Zuccoli
50.9/100
Nearby amenities
Gunn
31
Zuccoli
51
Population
Gunn
2,564
Zuccoli
4,131
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gunn | Zuccoli |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.0/100 | 50.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.4/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 8 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 56.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 31 | 51 |
| Green cover | 22.8% | 26.7% |
| Population | 2,564 | 4,131 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Gunn is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Zuccoli is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Gunn is stronger for family-friendly schooling options and improving crime trends; Zuccoli answers with housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. Gunn generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Zuccoli leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Zuccoli, while Gunn remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.