Gunn vs Zuccoli, NT Suburb Comparison

Gunn for families and investment; Zuccoli for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GunnZuccoli

Overall score

Gunn

43.0/100

Zuccoli

50.9/100

Nearby amenities

Gunn

31

Zuccoli

51

Population

Gunn

2,564

Zuccoli

4,131

Metric leadGunn 0Zuccoli 83 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGunnZuccoli
Overall score43.0/10050.9/100
Housing (desirability)30.4/10045.9/100
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves66
Public transport stops38
Walkability4.5/10056.0/100
Nearby amenities3151
Green cover22.8%26.7%
Population2,5644,131
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gunn is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Zuccoli is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Gunn is stronger for family-friendly schooling options and improving crime trends; Zuccoli answers with housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. Gunn generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Zuccoli leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Zuccoli, while Gunn remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons