Woodroffe vs Zuccoli, NT suburb comparison

Zuccoli for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

WoodroffeZuccoli

Overall score

Woodroffe

47.2/100

Zuccoli

59.6/100

Nearby amenities

Woodroffe

48

Zuccoli

51

Population

Woodroffe

3,175

Zuccoli

4,131

Metric leadWoodroffe 2Zuccoli 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryWoodroffeZuccoli
Overall score47.2/10059.6/100
Housing (desirability)50.1/10076.0/100
Schools & preschools94
Parks & reserves86
Public transport stops88
Walkability14.0/10056.0/100
Nearby amenities4851
Population3,1754,131
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/1010/10

Comparison summary

Woodroffe is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Zuccoli is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Woodroffe is stronger for parks and reserves; Zuccoli answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Woodroffe sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Zuccoli.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Zuccoli, while Woodroffe remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons