Overall score
Bellerive
64.5/100
Warrane
43.4/100
Bellerive vs Warrane, TAS Suburb Comparison
Bellerive for retirees and investment; Warrane for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BelleriveWarrane
Crime rate
Bellerive
55.5 / 1k
Warrane
55.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bellerive
172
Warrane
67
Population
Bellerive
4,945
Warrane
2,695
Metric leadBellerive 8Warrane 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bellerive | Warrane |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.5/100 | 43.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 70.7/100 | 70.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.5 / 1k | 55.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 39 | 27 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 172 | 67 |
| Green cover | 9.5% | 11.0% |
| Population | 4,945 | 2,695 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bellerive is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Warrane is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Warrane sits among greener hillside streets, while Bellerive keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Bellerive is stronger for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability; Warrane answers with housing affordability, plus parks and reserves. On housing, Bellerive sits in a gently premium band, compared with a affordable feel in Warrane.
Choose Bellerive if you are weighing retirees, families, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Warrane for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.