Bellevue Heights vs Craigburn Farm, SA Suburb Comparison

Bellevue Heights for retirees and value; Craigburn Farm for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bellevue HeightsCraigburn Farm

Overall score

Bellevue Heights

52.9/100

Craigburn Farm

56.3/100

Crime rate

Bellevue Heights

6.2 / 1k

Craigburn Farm

4.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bellevue Heights

31

Craigburn Farm

34

Population

Bellevue Heights

2,712

Craigburn Farm

3,099

Metric leadBellevue Heights 5Craigburn Farm 6across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBellevue HeightsCraigburn Farm
Overall score52.9/10056.3/100
Housing (desirability)67.3/10048.7/100
Crime rate6.2 / 1k4.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)56.4/10037.3/100
Public transport stops128
Walkability18.0/10012.0/100
Nearby amenities3134
Planning activity3237
Green cover35.6%63.4%
Population2,7123,099
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Bellevue Heights is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Craigburn Farm is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Bellevue Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Craigburn Farm keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bellevue Heights pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Craigburn Farm is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space.

Bellevue Heights suits investors more clearly, whereas Craigburn Farm is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons