Overall score
Bellevue Heights
44.1/100
Pasadena
53.0/100
Bellevue Heights for retirees and families; Pasadena for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bellevue Heights
44.1/100
Pasadena
53.0/100
Crime rate
Bellevue Heights
9.2 / 1k
Pasadena
55.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bellevue Heights
28
Pasadena
174
Population
Bellevue Heights
2,712
Pasadena
3,073
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bellevue Heights | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.1/100 | 53.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.5/100 | 28.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.2 / 1k | 55.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 16 |
| Walkability | 18.0/100 | 68.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 28 | 174 |
| Planning activity | 25 | 26 |
| Population | 2,712 | 3,073 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Bellevue Heights reads as a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Pasadena is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Bellevue Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Pasadena keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bellevue Heights tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Pasadena stands out for public transport access and walkability.
Bellevue Heights suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Pasadena is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.