Clapham vs Pasadena, SA suburb comparison

Clapham for retirees and families; Pasadena for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClaphamPasadena

Overall score

Clapham

43.1/100

Pasadena

54.8/100

Crime rate

Clapham

16.3 / 1k

Pasadena

57.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clapham

23

Pasadena

174

Population

Clapham

1,685

Pasadena

3,073

Metric leadClapham 4Pasadena 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClaphamPasadena
Overall score43.1/10054.8/100
Housing (desirability)47.5/10028.1/100
Crime rate16.3 / 1k57.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Public transport stops616
Walkability9.0/10068.0/100
Nearby amenities23174
Planning activity2126
Population1,6853,073
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Clapham is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Pasadena is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Clapham pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Pasadena is the better pick for schools and education options and public transport access.

Retirees and investors may find Clapham the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pasadena.

Related comparisons