Clapham vs Pasadena, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Clapham | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.3/100 | 52.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.5/100 | 28.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.1 / 1k | 59.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 16 |
| Walkability | 9.0/100 | 68.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 23 | 174 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 17 |
| Population | 1,685 | 3,073 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Clapham is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Pasadena is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Clapham pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Pasadena is the better pick for schools and education options and public transport access.
Retirees and families may find Clapham the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pasadena.