Clapham vs Westbourne Park, SA suburb comparison

Clapham for investment and value; Westbourne Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClaphamWestbourne Park

Overall score

Clapham

37.1/100

Westbourne Park

45.0/100

Crime rate

Clapham

25.6 / 1k

Westbourne Park

17.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clapham

23

Westbourne Park

60

Population

Clapham

1,685

Westbourne Park

2,564

Metric leadClapham 2Westbourne Park 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClaphamWestbourne Park
Overall score37.1/10045.0/100
Housing (desirability)47.5/10024.2/100
Crime rate25.6 / 1k17.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Public transport stops611
Walkability9.0/10018.5/100
Nearby amenities2360
Planning activity2124
Population1,6852,564
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Clapham is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Westbourne Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Clapham tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while Westbourne Park stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Clapham the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Westbourne Park.

Related comparisons