Clapham vs Glenalta, SA suburb comparison

Clapham for retirees and investment; Glenalta for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClaphamGlenalta

Overall score

Clapham

43.1/100

Glenalta

50.0/100

Crime rate

Clapham

16.3 / 1k

Glenalta

4.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clapham

23

Glenalta

36

Population

Clapham

1,685

Glenalta

2,039

Metric leadClapham 1Glenalta 72 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClaphamGlenalta
Overall score43.1/10050.0/100
Housing (desirability)47.5/10062.9/100
Crime rate16.3 / 1k4.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Public transport stops623
Walkability9.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities2336
Planning activity2124
Population1,6852,039
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Clapham reads as a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel; Glenalta is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city.

On the data, Clapham is stronger for an affluent, sought-after address and an emerging neighbourhood; Glenalta answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Choose Clapham if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Glenalta for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons