Clapham vs Cumberland Park, SA suburb comparison

Clapham for retirees and investment; Cumberland Park for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClaphamCumberland Park

Overall score

Clapham

37.1/100

Cumberland Park

46.6/100

Crime rate

Clapham

25.6 / 1k

Cumberland Park

88.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clapham

23

Cumberland Park

101

Population

Clapham

1,685

Cumberland Park

2,571

Metric leadClapham 4Cumberland Park 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClaphamCumberland Park
Overall score37.1/10046.6/100
Housing (desirability)47.5/10040.5/100
Crime rate25.6 / 1k88.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Public transport stops612
Walkability9.0/10070.0/100
Nearby amenities23101
Planning activity2129
Population1,6852,571
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Clapham is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Cumberland Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Clapham tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Cumberland Park stands out for public transport access and walkability.

Retirees may find Clapham the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Cumberland Park.

Related comparisons