Cumberland Park vs Torrens Park, SA Suburb Comparison

Cumberland Park for value; Torrens Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cumberland ParkTorrens Park

Overall score

Cumberland Park

53.9/100

Torrens Park

62.2/100

Crime rate

Cumberland Park

57.3 / 1k

Torrens Park

36.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cumberland Park

103

Torrens Park

68

Population

Cumberland Park

2,571

Torrens Park

2,687

Metric leadCumberland Park 5Torrens Park 6across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCumberland ParkTorrens Park
Overall score53.9/10062.2/100
Housing (desirability)72.2/10054.4/100
Crime rate57.3 / 1k36.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)56.4/10037.3/100
Public transport stops1223
Walkability70.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities10368
Planning activity3341
Green cover2.8%1.3%
Population2,5712,687
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Cumberland Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Torrens Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Cumberland Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space, whereas Torrens Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability.

Cumberland Park suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Torrens Park is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons