Overall score
Cumberland Park
46.6/100
Torrens Park
57.7/100
Cumberland Park for investment and value; Torrens Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cumberland Park
46.6/100
Torrens Park
57.7/100
Crime rate
Cumberland Park
88.6 / 1k
Torrens Park
37.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cumberland Park
101
Torrens Park
65
Population
Cumberland Park
2,571
Torrens Park
2,687
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cumberland Park | Torrens Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.6/100 | 57.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.5/100 | 22.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 88.6 / 1k | 37.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 23 |
| Walkability | 70.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 101 | 65 |
| Planning activity | 29 | 37 |
| Population | 2,571 | 2,687 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Cumberland Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Torrens Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Cumberland Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Torrens Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Cumberland Park suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Torrens Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.