Overall score
Cumberland Park
53.9/100
Torrens Park
62.2/100
Cumberland Park for value; Torrens Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cumberland Park
53.9/100
Torrens Park
62.2/100
Crime rate
Cumberland Park
57.3 / 1k
Torrens Park
36.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cumberland Park
103
Torrens Park
68
Population
Cumberland Park
2,571
Torrens Park
2,687
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cumberland Park | Torrens Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.9/100 | 62.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 72.2/100 | 54.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 57.3 / 1k | 36.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 23 |
| Walkability | 70.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 103 | 68 |
| Planning activity | 33 | 41 |
| Green cover | 2.8% | 1.3% |
| Population | 2,571 | 2,687 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Cumberland Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Torrens Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Cumberland Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space, whereas Torrens Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability.
Cumberland Park suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Torrens Park is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.