Overall score
Panorama
46.6/100
Torrens Park
57.0/100
Panorama vs Torrens Park, SA suburb comparison
Panorama for investment and value; Torrens Park for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
PanoramaTorrens Park
Crime rate
Panorama
28.1 / 1k
Torrens Park
36.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Panorama
43
Torrens Park
65
Population
Panorama
2,388
Torrens Park
2,687
Metric leadPanorama 3Torrens Park 6across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesTorrens Park
- Best for investmentPanorama
- Best for best valuePanorama
- Best for best schoolsTorrens Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Panorama | Torrens Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.6/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.8/100 | 22.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.1 / 1k | 36.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 19 | 23 |
| Walkability | 28.5/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 43 | 65 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 37 |
| Population | 2,388 | 2,687 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Panorama reads as a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel; Torrens Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Panorama pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Torrens Park is the better pick for public transport access and walkability.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Panorama the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Torrens Park.