Overall score
Eden Hills
49.0/100
Panorama
46.3/100
Eden Hills for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Eden Hills
49.0/100
Panorama
46.3/100
Crime rate
Eden Hills
24.3 / 1k
Panorama
30.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Eden Hills
77
Panorama
43
Population
Eden Hills
3,020
Panorama
2,388
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Eden Hills | Panorama |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.0/100 | 46.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.3/100 | 54.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 24.3 / 1k | 30.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 20 | 19 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 28.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 77 | 43 |
| Planning activity | 39 | 31 |
| Population | 3,020 | 2,388 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Eden Hills reads as a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace; Panorama is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Eden Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Panorama keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Eden Hills pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Panorama is the better pick for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, investors and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Eden Hills, while Panorama remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.